I will propose that we summarise the standard practice according to some descriptive rules.
- 0-14 days : express age in days.
- 14 days - 13 weeks (3 months) : express age in weeks
- 3 months - 12 months: express age in months and half months (e.g "8 and a half months")
- 12 months - 24 months : express age in months after the year (e.g. "a year and three months")
- 2 years - 4 years: in years with half years (e.g. "2 years and a half")
These rules seem ok, and they seem to follow standard practice. But I was looking for a simple, parsimonious rule. After looking at different options, I propose: Rule 1: Do not use any number higher than 12. Notice that this rule would not match the cutoffs of the originally proposed rules, but it would be a good approximation. What about the half months and half years? We can add Rule 2: Use half days, weeks, months, years, as granular units. This means that 6 months would hit Rule 1 as 12 half months. How would the descriptive rules above change?
- 0-6 days: age in half days.
- 6-12 days: age in full days.
- 12 days - 6 weeks: age in half weeks (e.g. one can say "3 weeks and a half")
- 7 weeks - 12 weeks: age in full weeks.
- 13 weeks - 6 months: age in half months (e.g. "4 and a half months")
- 6 months - 12 months: age in full months.
- 12 months - 6 years: age in half years.
- older than 6: age in full years.
I am quite satisfied with my parsimonious Rules 1 and 2. I still think it is ok to add the months to children between 1 and 2 years old, but that would make the rules too complex.
No comments:
Post a Comment